Alberta Business Marketing

And the hidden Challenges of B2B Branding.

The first time I ever noticed Little Giant ladders was in a series of Billy-Mays-type television ads the campaign featured a serious looking ladder that could be adjusted into 24 different configurations: the traditional A-frame look; the scaffold for uneven terrains; the extension to reach tree tops...and so on. You wouldn’t even consider taking this ladder out of the box without reviewing a demo video. Nobody in my household will climb a ladder higher than 4 feet – but I didn’t care. I just thought it would make a wonderful house accessory regardless of practicality.

A few years later a research project on industrial ladders warranted a closer look at this market: industrial ladders are a very serious business on both sides of the U.S./Canada border:
• Serious buyers (such as contractors) rely on serious (and complicated) looking comparison charts – detailing three or four basic ladder categories grouped by key factors (such as weight and height limits). In Canada these are based on CSA ratings and classifications.
• Ladder companies don’t sell ladders – they sell ladder systems. Even the 24-in-1 is available in three different models.
• And don’t forget key features – like tip and glide wheels and triple locking hinges and Light Wave Technology.

Little Giant is not much of a competitor in Canada’s industrial market but the company has developed a unique marketing (and branding) approach:
• It leverages its corporate brand name especially with the 24-in-1 ladder (which is targeted at consumers).
• On the industrial side the company has developed some sub-brands – the Synergy; the Big Trex; the Skyscraper.
• Little Giant also markets a whole series of ladder accessories: leg levellers; wing spans (for uneven surfaces); ladder racks.
• And there’s an info centre: with instructional and demonstration videos focussing on ladder configurations, ladder safety and ladder maintenance???
• Major players in the Canadian market adopt similar approaches – but not to the same extent.

There are many industrial product categories that have become more complex – the residential basement insulation market in the U.S. is dominated by three types of products: tar; membrane sprays; the much more complicated air gap drainage systems. Air gap products are fairly new to this market and are much harder to market.

There are several implications for the marketing of more complex business products. There has to be more of an emphasis on:
• Communication strategy - making sure target audiences understand all aspects of the product category (think about the home insulation company that realized its sales staff did not understand how its product worked).
• Target audience priorities - what messages to articulate and emphasize (think the marketer of construction materials emphasizing a 40-year warranty to homeowners who move every five years).
• Differing priorities among various groups – for ladders this could mean owners versus purchasers versus users.
• Understanding the difference between purchase requirements versus brand differentiators.
• The role and importance of the various distribution channels in the purchase process, as a source of product information; as a source of influence (think about research where we underestimated the role of retailers like Home Depot in the distribution chain).

Tags: Branding
Posted in B2B | | Comments Off

First a confession: When I was at University, I struggled with the concept of branding. An odd thing for someone in the business of building brands to admit, but it’s true; as a concept branding never made much sense. Every book had a different theory, every agency offered a different approach and every expert had some unique model or metric. Depending on who you talked to, or what you read, a brand could be a pyramid or a personality, an experience or an equation.

It seemed that branding was either the most compelling and complicated topic in marketing, or it was a load of crap.

Now an insight: Brands are like human beings. They exist as a mirror of our motivations, reflecting our ideals and dreams, fears and frailties. Nothing can exist in branding that doesn’t already exist in our everyday lives. In fact, if we want to better understand brands, we don’t need more complicated metrics, we need to better understand ourselves.

So how can we gain a better understanding? We need to go back to basics and re-consider the psychological and biological parallels between human beings and human brands.

Just like people, brands are born. Where a brand is born and to whom, are important factors in determining its development. A brand may have great nature (visual appeal or personality) but without the right nurture (parental support and security) it may never survive. As marketers, what type of parent are you and how will that affect the development of your brand?

Just like people, brands go through adolescence. Very few brands can become an overnight success; indeed it takes time to establish an identity and become independent. Attempting to circumvent this process can be as detrimental for a brand as it is for a person; the childhood stars of today are the forgotten failures of tomorrow (think Macaulay Culkin or Extreme Football League). What was your brand’s adolescence like; did it experiment and gain experience?

Just like people, brands need the right environment. As Prof. Richard Florida found in his study of cities, “the place we choose to live affects every aspect of our being. It can determine the income we earn, the people we meet, the friends we make, the partners we choose.” The same can be said for a brand. A brand must pick a place that will help it build relationships and earn the income it needs to survive. Is your brand in the right environment, an environment that matches its motivations?

Just like people, brands can get sick. We like to believe that we, and the things we create, are invincible - but nothing could be further from the truth. Human beings and brands are fragile and prone to illness. Even the strongest leaders can get sick (Bill Clinton or Toyota) and without proper treatment they may die (Michael Jackson or Pontiac). When was your last brand check-up, do you have insurance, or are you working your golden goose to death?

Just like people, brands must reproduce. Reproduction isn’t just fun, it’s fundamental to our survival. By reproducing we allow our species to adapt to the environment and evolve. A brand must also reproduce; it must adapt and evolve itself in order to maintain relevance and to respond to changes in the environment. Is your brand ready to reproduce?

As a brand strategist, having worked across three continents with many multinational clients, I believe there is something missing in our understanding of branding. As a morphological researcher, I believe what’s missing is an understanding of their humanity. Because brands are more than a metric or a model, they are a mirror of our psychological and biological motivations; and to properly understand them, we must better understand ourselves.

By Nick Black, Vice-President of Strategic Insight, Concerto Marketing Group

Tags: Branding, Research
Posted in Alberta Business | | Comments Off

I met Marty Neumeier (renown speaker and author of Zag, Brand Gap) when he was conducting a workshop at the Design Exchange. In conversation, Marty shared that he began his career implementing brand strategies only to realize there were a lot of flawed strategies that execution couldn’t fix. This prompted Marty to focus his effort on brand differentiation – the #1 strategy of a successful brand in Marty’s eyes. If you’re looking for verification of the power of differentiation think IPOD. 4th to market in the MP3 player category, Apple has 72% market share, a price point that is 2 to 5 times higher than the competitors....well I think you get the idea. High performance brands are way out in front in terms of loyalty, profitability and they’re tough to beat – unless of course you find your own unique way of differentiating.

One of the first rules is you can’t be all things to all people. In the session Marty talked about knowing your “tribe”. I caught up with Marty to get further clarity on why the tribe matters. “You have said the emphasis today needs to be on the Unique Buying Tribe rather than the Unique Selling Proposition. Can you explain that?”

Marty Neumeier: The Unique Selling Proposition was the brainchild of Rosser Reeves, an advertising genius from the "Mad Men" days. He worked for the Ted Bates agency and wrote a bestseller called, "Reality in Advertising." His thesis was simple: Advertisers need to focus all their energy on one strong claim or one strong concept. In a time when the industry believed "the more you tell, the more you sell," this was a refreshing idea that caught on almost immediately. It was so powerful, in fact, that to this day advertisers search high and low for "the big idea" to hang their campaigns on.

There's nothing inherently wrong with this inclination, as far as it goes. Without a unique value proposition, your campaign---and your business---will lose focus and have no compelling point of differentiation. The problem is that the principle now seems dated. Customers today don't like to be sold. What they like to do is buy, and they buy in tribes. Every brand has a tribe that supports it. If you talk WITH your tribe, they may well continue to support it. If you talk AT your tribe-using manipulative one-way conversations-they'll tune out in a New York second.

So rather than focusing on a Unique Selling Proposition, focus on a Unique Buying Tribe. If you find the right tribe and give it the right stuff, you'll get enough love to sustain your brand. People crave tribal identity. What they want to know is, "If I buy this product, what will this make me?"

Thanks Marty for sharing your insights. Marty is currently Director of Transformation at Liquid Agency.

Tags: Branding
Posted in Alberta Business | | Comments Off

Okay, I admit it. While you're reading this during the week at some point after the SuperBowl aired and know who won, I'm sitting here writing this blog entry on SuperBowl Sunday instead of watching the big game. And while I'll be interested to hear who won (Go Saints?), I, like you, will go online tomorrow to find out who advertised and which spot was the funniest or most outlandish. And then I'll go on with my day and probably never think about those spots ever again.

However, the Superbowl is the most watched televised event of the year with some 100 Million people expected to watch. According to a recently televised report, a 30 second spot on American TV during the Superbowl will go for between $2.5 and $2.8 Million. That's about $80,000 a second!

But the larger question being asked these days, especially by a lot of young people I know, is whether that money could be better spent. Especially with everything that's going on in the world right now.

Now after years of producing some of the most memorable Superbowl ads in history, PEPSI is asking the same question and has decided not to run an ad. Instead, they're going online with "The Pepsi Refresh Project". http://www.refresheverything.com/

According to their "refresh everything" site, they're looking for people, businesses, and non-profits with ideas that will have a positive impact. "Look around your community and think about how you want to change it." Submit your ideas and vote on your favourites. Those chosen will be awarded up to $250,000 in grants in categories ranging from Health, Arts & Culture, and Food & Shelter to the Planet, Neighbourhoods and Education.

And the so-called Pepsi Generation is eating it up. This is just one example of what's going on right now. We saw the impact the internet and social media had and is having post-Haiti. This is more of the same great trend. The NetGeneration is getting involved and looking for something more fulfilling than a gratuitous 30-second spot where the money spent to buy the media could eradicate so many issues affecting Haiti, Cambodia and the Congo to name a few -- and those affecting us right here at home. Pepsi is on to something and other brands ignore the trend at their peril.

Tags: Branding, Customer Experience, Get it off your chest, Viral
Posted in Advertising | | Comments Off

The latest research indicates that uncertain economic conditions have resulted in a decline in the core group of “Green Involved” consumers who would pay a premium for green products (17% in 2008 to 15% in 2009). The study (nationally representative sample of 2,465 adults, ages 18+) indicates that 2.7% of shoppers account for 70% of “informed and conscious green” purchases. Moreover, only 1 in 10 “green” shoppers is an “organic” shopper. Grocery transactions tend to be larger when green products are in the cart. In addition, 38% (45% in 2008) of Canadian consumers feel "highly concerned" about environmental issues. Even though consumers who feel “highly knowledgeable” about these issues increased to 29% (26% in 2008).

Transition to the mainstream

The transition has been driven by mainstream brands. Today, green has become another product attribute in a matrix of good-better-best benefit hierarchies. Tide has "biodegradable" ingredients. Others are labelled concentrates and cold water detergents. These are add-on benefits and enhance the core value proposition of the brand. They do not replace that core value proposition (superior product performance).

Today's customers are more demanding. They don’t believe all the claims being made by marketers- a fall out of greenwashing. Consumer scepticism has led marketers to include eco labels in their communication strategies. North America has over 350 eco-labels offered by trusted third parties. Marketers have laucnhed blogs and social networks with "fans" who contribute new product ideas. Method has its own Facebook page complete with a wall of comments from many of their 7,415 "fans" and a Twitter following of 3,284 users. Tide has 104,235 Facebook fans.

Please email me for additional insights from Arcus Consulting Group's studies on changing market drivers & successful strategic responses.

Tags: Branding, Research, social media, Strategy
Posted in Alberta Business | | Comments Off