<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alberta Business Marketing &#187; Not-for-Profit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/tag/not-for-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com</link>
	<description>All the Business Marketing Buzz in Alberta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Procrastination</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/1X5b6Z6-Gpk/procrastination.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/1X5b6Z6-Gpk/procrastination.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Waschkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2011/09/procrastination.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahhh – the beauty of procrastination.  We all do it.  Things get busy, and what was once important to us gets pushed to the bottom of the list.  Particularly things that don’t bring immediate impact… It’s not that it doesn’t matter anymore, i...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh – the beauty of procrastination.  We all do it.  Things get busy, and what was once important to us gets pushed to the bottom of the list.  Particularly things that don’t bring immediate impact… It’s not that it doesn’t matter anymore, it just gets easier every day to push it into the background and focus on what matters most on that particular day.  </p>

<p>For many (if not most) organizations – social media engagement tends to land in that procrastination bucket more often than not.  We all know it is important.  We all know the long term gains that ongoing engagement can provide.  But if we just skip today – will it really matter? And then, just one more day?  And then eventually, we realize 2 months have gone by and it has become too easy to keep it on the bottom of the list.<br />
I am a huge advocate for all organizations – both for those in the non-profit and for-profit sectors – to stay actively engaged in the social media space.  And I believe it’s critical for all of us in the marketing sector to do so on a personal level as well.  How can we improve our business success if we don’t know what the consumer sentiment is out there, if we don’t understand where our consumers are engaging, and if we aren’t playing in the space that our customers are living every day?  And how can our organizations gain consumer belief that we are engaged with them, if we take long spells off… and yet, here I am, 2 months into a new job and new routines, and realizing that the busy-ness of my life has gotten in the way of this important part of the business of my life.  My active engagement first slowed, and then stopped over the past 2 months, as I justified to myself every day that I would “get to it tomorrow”.  Luckily – “tomorrow” came today.  And as I jump back into it, and get myself back into a routine that keeps active engagement a daily part of my life, I thought I would write a quick post to urge all of you to do the same.  ….  Unfortunately it’s also been a couple of months since this blog made it up to the top of my list, so figured I’d correct that at the same time.</p>

<p>So please, remember – no matter what industry you are in – stay active in what is happening with your company, your competitors and your customers.  Know where people and businesses important to you are, and what they are saying.  And structure your day in such a way that it doesn’t make it to the procrastination bucket.    It doesn’t need to take too much time, but it does need to be consistently acted upon.</p>

<p>Now if you’ll excuse me – I’m feeling a need to tweet.</p>

<p><em>Vicki Waschkowski</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/1X5b6Z6-Gpk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/9315/procrastination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of Community, in its Truest Sense</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/7y_DFBkNhig/the_power_of_community_in_its.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/7y_DFBkNhig/the_power_of_community_in_its.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Waschkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2011/05/the_power_of_community_in_its.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I write this I am overwhelmed with emotion, from the incredible outpouring of true community that I have recently been a part of – that deep down I feared no longer existed in such an intrinsic way.  Much of what I do for a living surrounds the id...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I write this I am overwhelmed with emotion, from the incredible outpouring of true community that I have recently been a part of – that deep down I feared no longer existed in such an intrinsic way.  Much of what I do for a living surrounds the idea of leveraging community from a social marketing perspective –and using it to rally people behind a cause, or a company, or a movement for change.  That is social media at its finest.  The whole idea of social media in fact brings us back a couple generations to the small-town lifestyle where everyone knew everyone else in their community, where there was a constant social engagement, and everyone intrinsically helped their neighbours in times of need.  Those days have sadly changed in most neighbourhoods today…. Or at least I thought they had.  Gladly, I was proven wrong.</p>

<p>My young son attends a daycare, a part of a network of 3 childcare centres in a suburb outside of Toronto.  About 2 weeks ago, we were told about a little 3-year-old boy who attends one of the 3 centres, who had been diagnosed with cancer and was immediately rushed to SickKids for surgery, and is now starting chemotherapy.  It was every parent’s nightmare becoming reality for this boy’s family.  I had never met, and will likely never know, this boy or his family – and yet they are a part of our community.  The daycare is a core part of our life – where my little boy, just like theirs, spends a majority of his waking hours.  His daycare is a part of our daycare network, and therefore a part of the extended family.  As I’m sure with every parent, his story really hit home, his pictures bringing tears to my eyes, and my compassion immediately reaching out to his parents.  While life as they knew it stopped for this family, to tend to their boy, the daycare staff at the 3 centres immediately jumped into action to develop a fundraiser to help them out.  They hosted a dance-a-thon where all the children of the 3 centres went out into the May sunshine and danced.  For almost 90 minutes, the children had fun outside dancing, with contributions from their family and friends through purchases of cancer-society bracelets for the kids and donations to the family.  </p>

<p>I must admit – at first I hesitated on what (if anything) to give as a donation.  I didn’t know these people.  There are lots of causes out there.  Did they really need financial support? Were there more “worthy” choices?  My son is too young to collect donations… all of the typical barriers to action every non-profit faces.  But of course I knew that this was a family, just like my own, whose lives had just been stopped in time.  A family whose only focus right now was on saving their little boy.  We are their community – and of course we should help.  I wondered though if others in the daycare network would feel the same?   They did.</p>

<p>This brings me back to the start of my story. Where I am sitting here in tears as the understanding of community truly washes over me, and the realization that it still exists in the real world, in this day and age, and in an off-line way.  The parents of my son’s small daycare, families just like mine who are struggling with huge daycare payments of their own (on top of mortgages, commuting, etc), donated $6,200 to the fundraiser.  The parents of the location that the boy himself attended, not surprisingly, raised even more.   And the total of the small network of parents from the 3 centres, donated an incredible $26,000 to help this boy and his parents through a very difficult time.  </p>

<p>So why am I writing about this on a CMA blog?  Because it proves that the sense of community is alive and well, even with time-stressed young parents in Toronto.  As marketers for organizations with a strong cause – we need to leverage this sense of community.  We need to think about how to bring communities together (both online and offline), and to hit home in people’s hearts in a powerful way.  And we need to teach our children (and ourselves) the power of compassion.  I hope that all of the children in these 3 daycares were taught a very valuable lesson – that when someone needs our help, we help.  That every person, no matter how small, can make a real difference in someone’s life.  </p>

<p>My son understands that his dancing made this other little boy happy.  His Mom knows that the togetherness of community made a real difference to this boy’s parents.  As a person, my faith in the intrinsic goodness of humanity has been restored, and I have developed a strong connection to a family who I will likely never meet thanks to the power of compassion.  As a marketer, I have become even more committed to the idea of developing and leveraging community in its truest sense for my cause-marketing clients.  </p>

<p>I hope you will take the same lessons.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/7y_DFBkNhig" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/8711/the-power-of-community-in-its-truest-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Impact on a Small Budget</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/psg4iA96A_U/a_lesson_learned_from_a.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/psg4iA96A_U/a_lesson_learned_from_a.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Waschkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2011/05/a_lesson_learned_from_a.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...A lesson learned from a local charity with a big heart

I have spent most of my career on the agency-side of marketing, working with large corporations in the financial, automotive, and B2B sectors.  When I first began immersing myself in the not-fo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>...A lesson learned from a local charity with a big heart</em></p>

<p>I have spent most of my career on the agency-side of marketing, working with large corporations in the financial, automotive, and B2B sectors.  When I first began immersing myself in the not-for-profit space a couple of years ago, it was an incredibly refreshing change.  And while I still balance clients in both for-profit and not-for-profit sectors, my serious passion is in helping the charitable sector succeed.  I think there is tremendous value in bringing for-profit business strategies to the not-for-profit space.  And certainly in today’s marketing world of engagement and social media integration – what better space to play and experiment, than with a charitable organization – who inherently brings with it a passionate base of people who care personally about the cause.  These are the people who will become the ambassadors, and ultimately the fundraisers, for the organization. </p>

<p>In partnering with MacLaren Kiindrid, a new division of MacLaren McCann focused on the non-profit and social good space, I have recently begun working with an incredible local charity – Camp Oochigeas.  “Ooch” is a magical place – where kids with cancer can come to just be kids.  The work they do with these children is truly phenomenal, and the stories are incredibly heart-warming.  But more than that, Ooch is a great example to the many non-profits out there at demonstrating how incredible success can be achieved by leveraging a great cause through an integrated campaign/event.  Big budgets aren’t required to make a big impact.  A great lesson not only for all you NFPs, but for an agency girl typically accustomed to big budgets.</p>

<p>Starting this week, the CMA Not-For-Profit council will be publishing NFP case studies, to be released throughout the year. (CMA members can <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?C=39&K=224244&ListingByCategory=2011/2010+Articles/Case+Studies">view the full case study and video here</a>.)   Camp Ooch has the honour of being the first case study in this process.  I encourage all NFP’s out there, and corporations seeking a case study in social good, to have a look.  It shows how some sound strategic thinking, a strong creative theme, and a whole lot of passion can drive some solid event success.  Despite a difficult environment (immediately following Haiti, and in the midst of a recession), the case study shows how Ooch was able to exceed their $500,000 fundraising goal for a single bi-annual event by over $75,000 – in the course of 2 weeks.  </p>

<p>… and in typical DM fashion, I’ll finish with a small call-to-action to encourage you to follow <a href="http://www.facebook.com/CampOoch"onclick="this.;">Ooch online </a>as they lead up to the upcoming launch of the camp’s newest addition – bringing Ooch to downtown Toronto with a year-round indoor camp for children battling childhood cancer.  Those of you in Toronto – keep an eye out for some amazing local market activity in the coming months.</p>

<p><em>Vicki Waschkowski</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/psg4iA96A_U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/8660/big-impact-on-a-small-budget-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Impact on a Small Budget</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/f6rILq5Iti4/big_impact_on_a_small_budget_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/f6rILq5Iti4/big_impact_on_a_small_budget_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Marketing Blog - Canadian Marketing Association</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2011/05/big_impact_on_a_small_budget_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...A lesson learned from a local charity with a big heart

I have spent most of my career on the agency-side of marketing, working with large corporations in the financial, automotive, and B2B sectors.  When I first began immersing myself in the not-fo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>...A lesson learned from a local charity with a big heart</em></p>

<p>I have spent most of my career on the agency-side of marketing, working with large corporations in the financial, automotive, and B2B sectors.  When I first began immersing myself in the not-for-profit space a couple of years ago, it was an incredibly refreshing change.  And while I still balance clients in both for-profit and not-for-profit sectors, my serious passion is in helping the charitable sector succeed.  I think there is tremendous value in bringing for-profit business strategies to the not-for-profit space.  And certainly in today’s marketing world of engagement and social media integration – what better space to play and experiment, than with a charitable organization – who inherently brings with it a passionate base of people who care personally about the cause.  These are the people who will become the ambassadors, and ultimately the fundraisers, for the organization. </p>

<p>In partnering with MacLaren Kiindrid, a new division of MacLaren McCann focused on the non-profit and social good space, I have recently begun working with an incredible local charity – Camp Oochigeas.  “Ooch” is a magical place – where kids with cancer can come to just be kids.  The work they do with these children is truly phenomenal, and the stories are incredibly heart-warming.  But more than that, Ooch is a great example to the many non-profits out there at demonstrating how incredible success can be achieved by leveraging a great cause through an integrated campaign/event.  Big budgets aren’t required to make a big impact.  A great lesson not only for all you NFPs, but for an agency girl typically accustomed to big budgets.</p>

<p>Starting this week, the CMA Not-For-Profit council will be publishing NFP case studies, to be released throughout the year. (CMA members can <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?C=39&K=224244&ListingByCategory=2011/2010+Articles/Case+Studies">view the full case study and video here</a>.)   Camp Ooch has the honour of being the first case study in this process.  I encourage all NFP’s out there, and corporations seeking a case study in social good, to have a look.  It shows how some sound strategic thinking, a strong creative theme, and a whole lot of passion can drive some solid event success.  Despite a difficult environment (immediately following Haiti, and in the midst of a recession), the case study shows how Ooch was able to exceed their $500,000 fundraising goal for a single bi-annual event by over $75,000 – in the course of 2 weeks.  </p>

<p>… and in typical DM fashion, I’ll finish with a small call-to-action to encourage you to follow <a href="http://www.facebook.com/CampOoch"onclick="this.;">Ooch online </a>as they lead up to the upcoming launch of the camp’s newest addition – bringing Ooch to downtown Toronto with a year-round indoor camp for children battling childhood cancer.  Those of you in Toronto – keep an eye out for some amazing local market activity in the coming months.</p>

<p><em>Vicki Waschkowski</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/f6rILq5Iti4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/8657/big-impact-on-a-small-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Charities Need to Know about the National Do Not Call List Service</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/B5p4mLdrnpE/what_charities_need_to_know_ab_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/B5p4mLdrnpE/what_charities_need_to_know_ab_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CMA on behalf of P.J. VanAuken at Wyers Direct Communciations</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alberta Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics / Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2010/06/what_charities_need_to_know_ab_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Together with my colleagues on the CMA <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?WCE=C=47&#124;K=225227">Not-for-Profit Council</a>,  we've customized these <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?WCE=C=47&#124;K=229816">FAQs</a> for charities that clarify the rules governing the use of the National Do Not Call List Service (NDNCL) and other telemarketing regulations.</p>

<blockquote>The key message is that as a registered charity, you do not need to use the National DNCL for your own telemarketing activities.  However, you do need to maintain numbers on your own do not call list for a period of 3 years and 31 days from anyone requesting not to be called.  Additionally, you still must comply with all other telemarketing regulations (see <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?WCE=C=47&#124;K=229816">FAQs</a>) and be aware of and comply with additional registration and regulations that each province may have.</blockquote>

<p>While the regulatory framework may seem restrictive and maked it more challenging to raise money for important causes, the rules benefit both consumers and businesses.  The telemarketing regulations are the best practices that a reputable agency or charity would want to follow any way.  After all, these are your donors we are talking about.  They deserve to be treated with these common sense courtesies.  </p>

<p>By following the rules and best practices that help maintain a “clean” market place, our goal should be to improve telemarketing so that it is generally accepted as having a positive and helpful conversation with your donors.</p>

<p><em>P.J. VanAuken </em><br />
<em>Vice President of Client Services, Wyers Direct Communciations </em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/B5p4mLdrnpE" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Together with my colleagues on the CMA <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?WCE=C=47%7cK=225227">Not-for-Profit Council</a>,  we've customized these <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?WCE=C=47%7cK=229816">FAQs</a> for charities that clarify the rules governing the use of the National Do Not Call List Service (NDNCL) and other telemarketing regulations.</p>

<blockquote>The key message is that as a registered charity, you do not need to use the National DNCL for your own telemarketing activities.  However, you do need to maintain numbers on your own do not call list for a period of 3 years and 31 days from anyone requesting not to be called.  Additionally, you still must comply with all other telemarketing regulations (see <a href="http://www.the-cma.org/?WCE=C=47%7cK=229816">FAQs</a>) and be aware of and comply with additional registration and regulations that each province may have.</blockquote>

<p>While the regulatory framework may seem restrictive and maked it more challenging to raise money for important causes, the rules benefit both consumers and businesses.  The telemarketing regulations are the best practices that a reputable agency or charity would want to follow any way.  After all, these are your donors we are talking about.  They deserve to be treated with these common sense courtesies.  </p>

<p>By following the rules and best practices that help maintain a “clean” market place, our goal should be to improve telemarketing so that it is generally accepted as having a positive and helpful conversation with your donors.</p>

<p><em>P.J. VanAuken </em><br />
<em>Vice President of Client Services, Wyers Direct Communciations </em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/B5p4mLdrnpE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/6785/what-charities-need-to-know-about-the-national-do-not-call-list-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Charities Fundraise on Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/i_m1vd341eA/can_charities_fundraise_on_fac.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/i_m1vd341eA/can_charities_fundraise_on_fac.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angie Mackie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alberta Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2010/05/can_charities_fundraise_on_fac.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of our clients, Lupus Canada, has found a way to raise both awareness and cash on Facebook. </p>

<p>They’ve accomplished this by partnering with Jergens Canada on a campaign called ‘SHED LIGHT ON LUPUS ‘. It’s an online campaign that saw Lupus Canada receive $1.00 for the first 5,000 people who became fans of Jergens Canada on Facebook and wrote “Shed Light on Lupus”.</p>

<p>This ongoing campaign is geared to drive people to the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/JergensCanada#!/JergensCanada?v=wall">Jergens Canada Facebook page  </a>and from there includes a link to the <a href="http://www.skintervention.ca">Skintervention Campaign site</a>  where there is more detailed <a href="http://skintervention.ca/supportlupus.html">information about lupus</a>, the campaign and where you’ll find the videos shot by the charity’s celebrity ambassadors Colin Mochrie and Debra McGrath.  You can also follow along on Twitter@Skintervention.</p>

<p>Even though the funds raised are small (if you visit the site, you’ll see they’ve already received their 5,000 visitor goal), they have found a way to generate revenue and in addition, receive much needed public awareness for a charity that has a tough time competing in a space with much larger and more recognized health charities. </p>

<p><em>What about [other] examples of successful Facebook campaigns involving charities? </em></p>

<p><em>Angie Mackie</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/i_m1vd341eA" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of our clients, Lupus Canada, has found a way to raise both awareness and cash on Facebook. </p>

<p>They’ve accomplished this by partnering with Jergens Canada on a campaign called ‘SHED LIGHT ON LUPUS ‘. It’s an online campaign that saw Lupus Canada receive $1.00 for the first 5,000 people who became fans of Jergens Canada on Facebook and wrote “Shed Light on Lupus”.</p>

<p>This ongoing campaign is geared to drive people to the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/JergensCanada#!/JergensCanada?v=wall">Jergens Canada Facebook page  </a>and from there includes a link to the <a href="http://www.skintervention.ca">Skintervention Campaign site</a>  where there is more detailed <a href="http://skintervention.ca/supportlupus.html">information about lupus</a>, the campaign and where you’ll find the videos shot by the charity’s celebrity ambassadors Colin Mochrie and Debra McGrath.  You can also follow along on Twitter@Skintervention.</p>

<p>Even though the funds raised are small (if you visit the site, you’ll see they’ve already received their 5,000 visitor goal), they have found a way to generate revenue and in addition, receive much needed public awareness for a charity that has a tough time competing in a space with much larger and more recognized health charities. </p>

<p><em>What about [other] examples of successful Facebook campaigns involving charities? </em></p>

<p><em>Angie Mackie</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/i_m1vd341eA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/6531/can-charities-fundraise-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can Brands Learn from the Not-for-Profit Sector?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/BoJKdIhXhyU/what_can_brands_learn_from_the.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/BoJKdIhXhyU/what_can_brands_learn_from_the.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alberta Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2010/04/what_can_brands_learn_from_the.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>The importance of engagement.</em></p>

<p>I revently had the opportunity to participate in a retreat as a new board member of the MS Society of Canada. </p>

<p>The first day of the retreat included a session led by an expert facilitator (recipient of the Order of Canada) with expertise in volunteer engagement. Several of the topics which she discussed have direct relevance to corporate Canada and successful internal branding practices.</p>

<p>The session started with a discussion of the <strong>core values of engaged volunteers</strong> which included the attributes: <em>helpful, committed, caring, motivated and team oriented</em>. Indeed these are several of the key values which corporate Canada promotes to engage its employee base. However, the non-profit sector does have an advantage in that their employees and volunteers also possess a passion for their cause.</p>

<p>Non-profits acknowledge that volunteers are the glue of their organization. Their focus is not about how to <em>manage</em> volunteers but how to <em>engage</em> volunteers. If only corporations could take more of this type of focus with their employees. Imagine if employees were passionate and engaged in their work and treated more as a customer and less like human capital; a resource to be managed and measured.</p>

<p>With a re-newed emphasis on Employer of Choice status, several corporations appear to be moving in this direction. Or are they?</p>

<p><em>Patricia McQuillan</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/BoJKdIhXhyU" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The importance of engagement.</em></p>

<p>I revently had the opportunity to participate in a retreat as a new board member of the MS Society of Canada. </p>

<p>The first day of the retreat included a session led by an expert facilitator (recipient of the Order of Canada) with expertise in volunteer engagement. Several of the topics which she discussed have direct relevance to corporate Canada and successful internal branding practices.</p>

<p>The session started with a discussion of the <strong>core values of engaged volunteers</strong> which included the attributes: <em>helpful, committed, caring, motivated and team oriented</em>. Indeed these are several of the key values which corporate Canada promotes to engage its employee base. However, the non-profit sector does have an advantage in that their employees and volunteers also possess a passion for their cause.</p>

<p>Non-profits acknowledge that volunteers are the glue of their organization. Their focus is not about how to <em>manage</em> volunteers but how to <em>engage</em> volunteers. If only corporations could take more of this type of focus with their employees. Imagine if employees were passionate and engaged in their work and treated more as a customer and less like human capital; a resource to be managed and measured.</p>

<p>With a re-newed emphasis on Employer of Choice status, several corporations appear to be moving in this direction. Or are they?</p>

<p><em>Patricia McQuillan</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/BoJKdIhXhyU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/6079/what-can-brands-learn-from-the-not-for-profit-sector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Reduced Direct Mail Acquisition in 2009 Hurt Fundraisers in 2010?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/etbP7cmEHGU/will_reduced_direct_mail_acqui.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/etbP7cmEHGU/will_reduced_direct_mail_acqui.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CMA  on behalf of  Kamy Zarbafi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alberta Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2010/03/will_reduced_direct_mail_acqui.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Cornerstone concluded a study of our Fundraising Clients’ 2009 mailing activity versus 2008.  Results from early in the year showed a significant decline in mailing levels – particularly in the area of new donor acquisition.  Overall, our clients mailed 12% fewer solicitations in 2009 than in the previous year, including both prospect and house file mailings.  Although mailing levels increased to previous levels for existing donors by the end of the year, prospect mailings continued to be significantly reduced.</p>

<p>So what will be the impact of that decline in volume?  The good news is that response rates and revenue per donor increased in 2009 for both prospect and house file mailings, indicating that fundraisers have a stable base of high quality current and future donors.  However, those fundraisers who severely curtailed their prospecting activity in 2009 will be in a weaker position in 2010 due to smaller growth in their house files – which represents the most lucrative source of ongoing donation revenue available.  </p>

<p>Moving in to 2010, we recommend that Fundraising Clients start prospecting more aggressively again to make up for this shortfall.  Results from 2009 demonstrated that Canadians are clearly willing to give and smart fundraisers will want to benefit from their generosity.</p>

<p>For Cornerstone’s complete 2009 Direct Mail Performance Analysis, <a href="http://www.cstonecanada.com/publications/pdfs/whitepapers/CFS-YTD%20DirectMail_Performance_Analysis_4Q.pdf">click here</a>. </p>

<p><em>By Kamy Zarbafi, Vice President, Publishing Services/Fundraising Services,  Cornerstone Fundraising Services and Chair of CMA’s Not-For-Profit Council</em><br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/etbP7cmEHGU" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Cornerstone concluded a study of our Fundraising Clients’ 2009 mailing activity versus 2008.  Results from early in the year showed a significant decline in mailing levels – particularly in the area of new donor acquisition.  Overall, our clients mailed 12% fewer solicitations in 2009 than in the previous year, including both prospect and house file mailings.  Although mailing levels increased to previous levels for existing donors by the end of the year, prospect mailings continued to be significantly reduced.</p>

<p>So what will be the impact of that decline in volume?  The good news is that response rates and revenue per donor increased in 2009 for both prospect and house file mailings, indicating that fundraisers have a stable base of high quality current and future donors.  However, those fundraisers who severely curtailed their prospecting activity in 2009 will be in a weaker position in 2010 due to smaller growth in their house files – which represents the most lucrative source of ongoing donation revenue available.  </p>

<p>Moving in to 2010, we recommend that Fundraising Clients start prospecting more aggressively again to make up for this shortfall.  Results from 2009 demonstrated that Canadians are clearly willing to give and smart fundraisers will want to benefit from their generosity.</p>

<p>For Cornerstone’s complete 2009 Direct Mail Performance Analysis, <a href="http://www.cstonecanada.com/publications/pdfs/whitepapers/CFS-YTD%20DirectMail_Performance_Analysis_4Q.pdf">click here</a>. </p>

<p><em>By Kamy Zarbafi, Vice President, Publishing Services/Fundraising Services,  Cornerstone Fundraising Services and Chair of CMA’s Not-For-Profit Council</em><br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/etbP7cmEHGU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/5970/will-reduced-direct-mail-acquisition-in-2009-hurt-fundraisers-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Canadians Giving Less in 2009?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/ZNIJClJUtnY/are_canadians_giving_less_in_2_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~3/ZNIJClJUtnY/are_canadians_giving_less_in_2_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CMA  on behalf of  Kamy Zarbafi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alberta Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not-for-Profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmarketingblog.com/archives/2009/07/are_canadians_giving_less_in_2_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That’s the question on every fundraiser’s mind right now.  So what impact has the global recession had on direct mail fundraising in 2009?  Recently, we undertook a study of our Client’s 1st quarter acquisition and retention activity to find out and there were some interesting results.</p>

<p>The first significant finding was that our Clients reduced their efforts to acquire new donors via direct mail during the 1st quarter of 2009.  Total outbound solicitations dropped 42%, while responses and donation revenue dropped at an even greater rate of 73% and 60% correspondingly.  One bright note however – those prospects who did respond donated more on average. While the reduction in new donor acquisition likely saved fundraisers money in 2009, it could have a significant impact on their ability to fundraise in 2010 and beyond. </p>

<p>Surprisingly, there were 13% fewer solicitations to house files in the 1st quarter of 2009 versus 2008.  Those donors that responded contributed more than in previous years.  The average gift climbed by almost 3%, resulting in an increase in the gross revenue per mail piece.  However, as with prospects, existing donors responded less frequently than in previous years – although the decline in response was no where near as severe as with prospects.</p>

<p>So what can we take away from these results?  There seems to be no question that fundraisers were cutting campaigns in early 2009 as a result of the recession.  However, given the results from the mailings that did occur, it’s unclear whether that strategy was the right one.  In the case of house mailings, response rates stayed relatively consistent with the previous year while average gift increased indicating that those fundraisers who cut back on their house programs left money on the table.  In the case of prospect mailings, results were down.  However, those fundraisers who did prospect will be in a much better position to take advantage when the recession ends as they’ve added to their house file.  So while it appears that Canadians are giving less in 2009, those organizations who continue to fundraise will stand to benefit during a recovery when Canadians begin to open their wallets again.</p>

<p><em>Authored by Kamy Zarbafi, Vice President Publishing Services/Fundraising Services at<br />
Cornerstone Fundraising</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/ZNIJClJUtnY" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s the question on every fundraiser’s mind right now.  So what impact has the global recession had on direct mail fundraising in 2009?  Recently, we undertook a study of our Client’s 1st quarter acquisition and retention activity to find out and there were some interesting results.</p>

<p>The first significant finding was that our Clients reduced their efforts to acquire new donors via direct mail during the 1st quarter of 2009.  Total outbound solicitations dropped 42%, while responses and donation revenue dropped at an even greater rate of 73% and 60% correspondingly.  One bright note however – those prospects who did respond donated more on average. While the reduction in new donor acquisition likely saved fundraisers money in 2009, it could have a significant impact on their ability to fundraise in 2010 and beyond. </p>

<p>Surprisingly, there were 13% fewer solicitations to house files in the 1st quarter of 2009 versus 2008.  Those donors that responded contributed more than in previous years.  The average gift climbed by almost 3%, resulting in an increase in the gross revenue per mail piece.  However, as with prospects, existing donors responded less frequently than in previous years – although the decline in response was no where near as severe as with prospects.</p>

<p>So what can we take away from these results?  There seems to be no question that fundraisers were cutting campaigns in early 2009 as a result of the recession.  However, given the results from the mailings that did occur, it’s unclear whether that strategy was the right one.  In the case of house mailings, response rates stayed relatively consistent with the previous year while average gift increased indicating that those fundraisers who cut back on their house programs left money on the table.  In the case of prospect mailings, results were down.  However, those fundraisers who did prospect will be in a much better position to take advantage when the recession ends as they’ve added to their house file.  So while it appears that Canadians are giving less in 2009, those organizations who continue to fundraise will stand to benefit during a recovery when Canadians begin to open their wallets again.</p>

<p><em>Authored by Kamy Zarbafi, Vice President Publishing Services/Fundraising Services at<br />
Cornerstone Fundraising</em></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianMarketingBlog/~4/ZNIJClJUtnY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://albertabusinessmarketing.com/1216/are-canadians-giving-less-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

